
Cases & Actions
Conley v. Hirsch
On April 14, ELC and co-counsel filed a class action lawsuit in the Eastern District of North Carolina to protect the rights of Plaintiffs and similarly situated voters to have their votes count in what was an historically close race for a seat on the state's highest court. The suit alleges that the state board's retroactive application of a change in state election rules first articulated months after the 2024 election was conducted, which Plaintiffs could not possibly have complied with at the time of the election, violates Plaintiffs' due process, equal protection, and fundamental voting rights under the United States Constitution.
UPDATED: June 12, 2025
VICTORY: On May 5, 2025, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled in favor of Plaintiffs and ordered that the North Carolina Board of Elections certify the results of the 2024 election for Supreme Court seat six.
UPDATE: On April 22, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion of Stay/Injunction Pending an Appeal
UPDATE: On April 17, 2025, Plaintiffs filed an Emergency Motion of Stay/Injunction Pending an Appeal to stop the District Court’s order for Defendants to “proceed” with the disqualify-then-cure process until the case is decided.
BACKGROUND
The Election Law Clinic, along with co-counsel Protect Democracy and Altshuler Berzon, is representing overseas civilian and military voters voters who voted in the 2024 election for a seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court and are now at imminent risk of being retroactively disenfranchised. Plaintiffs all voted in accordance with state and federal election rules in place at the time of the 2024 election, which explicitly did not require them (and, functionally, did not allow them to) submit a copy of their photo identification along with their absentee ballot. After all the votes in the 2024 election were counted, however, the losing candidate challenged the validity of Plaintiffs' votes - and the votes of thousands of similarly situated voters across counties where voter registration data suggested that voters disproportionately supported his opponent - for not submitting a copy of their photo identification along with their absentee ballots. More than five months after the election, the North Carolina Supreme Court concluded, for the first time, that the state's voter ID law did apply to overseas civilian and military voters. As a result, the state board of elections was ordered to presumptively disqualify votes cast by this category of voters in the challenged counties, whose votes will be discarded unless they can provide additional "verification" of the validity of their vote in an unprecedented 30-day "cure" process.
DOCUMENTS
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division
May 5, 2025
April 14, 2025